Frodo and Harry's Sacrifice: How Do They Resemble Christ?

Chapter 14- Yes, She’s a Christ Figure, Too

In literature, there are the classic archetypes. You have your hero, your mentor, your side-kick, your damsel in distress, etcetera. But another, often-times overlooked (by high school students at least) character that resurfaces again and again throughout literature is the Christ figure. Foster provides a list, some criteria if you will, for a character to qualify as a Christ figure. Among these are things like being in agony, sacrificing themselves, humbling themselves, and redeeming a broken world.

For me, when thinking of examples of Christ figures in literature, the first one that comes to mind is Frodo Baggins from the Lord of the Rings. Now, Frodo was not thirty-three years old; in fact, he was fifty years old when the story begins, but Foster clearly says that a Christ figure doesn’t have to fit all the criteria, just enough to where they are recognizably a symbol of Christ. Frodo also never died and rose from the grave. Well, not literally he didn’t, but he may have figuratively, as Brendan McManus M.J. says in his article discussing some of the Christian allegories found in the Lord of the Rings. After destroying the ring that was slowly destroying him, eating away at his soul, his soul is “resurrected.” He sails to Valinor, a land where he will be immortal, and lives among elves, protected from the horrors of the mainland.

At the beginning of the story when he’s in Rivendell, Frodo has to accept his fate, his duty to take the ring on a perilous journey across the continent to a place called Mordor, which scarily resembles Hell, with it’s head, Lord Sauron, scarily resembling the Devil. This ring is a great burden to Frodo, just like the weight of the cross and the sins of the world were a great burden to Christ. In the deep wilderness, Frodo is confronted by Boromir and tempted. Boromir tells Frodo how his burden will be lifted if he just gives the ring to him. He tells him that he doesn’t have to do this, just as the devil tempted Jesus in the wilderness, telling him that he could throw himself off the top of the temple and save himself, basically saying that Jesus didn’t have to die on the cross later because he was powerful enough to save himself. Yet both Frodo and Jesus knew that that was never an option. They both resisted their tempters and went on to fulfill their duty. Frodo was in considerable agony the closer he got to Mt. Doom, just as Christ was suffering on the road to Calvary and on the Cross. Frodo was tempted again once inside the mountain. When the ring was destroyed, Lord Sauron was destroyed and Middle Earth was redeemed, and Frodo departed (ascended) to Valinor (Heaven), just like when Jesus died, the world was redeemed and now  there is the promise that the Devil will be defeated when he returns.

There are many other Christ-like characters in the Lord of the Rings, like Aragorn who was the king restored to his throne, granting hope to all, as Jesus will when he returns. Also, Gandalf serves as the Fellowship’s guide, almost like a teacher leading his disciples. Also, Gandalf dies by defeating the Balrog, who could be seen as the Devil, and then later, Gandalf returns from the dead.

Foster talks about how many readers look right over all these Biblical allegories throughout literature because they are not familiar with the Bible. I think that one way readers can understand these allegories even without being aware of the Bible, is applying it to a more universal archetype: the Messiah, or Savior, which, even though that is what Jesus is, the term is not restricted to only him. Viewing Frodo as a Savior for Middle Earth might be more applicable to some than viewing him as Jesus himself.

Another very good example of a savior character, or a Christ figure is Harry Potter, but his story gets more into what happened to Christ after he was resurrected, which Foster doesn’t really talk about (but which is still a very identifying thing in Christ figures in literature). Whether JK Rowling intended her books to reflect this story or not, I have personally observed it. Harry Potter was marked for greatness with his lightning bolt scar (which I will talk more about in another entry). There were even prophecies about him. He grew up with everyone expecting him to defeat the world and destroy Voldemort (the Devil, for our purposes). Harry faced many trials along the way: loneliness, mockery, scorn, temptation, physical pain, and an impossible task that seemed like suicide, to destroy the Horcruxes. Yet he bravely persevered, even though he didn't want to. In the end, he faced Voldemort, was killed, but was miraculously resurrected. He came back for his friends and completely destroyed the enemy and Voldemort himself. This looks an awful lot like Jesus’s story: his birth was prophesied long before, his followers expected him to come with fire and hailstorms, destroying Rome, he faced many trials and sufferings: he was mocked, tempted, beaten, and brutally killed. He rose again and will come back for his followers and will destroy the enemy and the Devil.

There are so many examples that I could go on for ages, but I had to chose just some of my favorites. Others include Aslan from the Chronicles of Narnia, Superman, Spock from Star Trek, the Doctor from Doctor Who, and basically anyone that exhibits the qualities that Foster lists.

Foster explains how if a reader thinks that a character might be a Christ figure, he most likely is, because it is really the reader's opinion or perception that makes a story unique for everyone. As long as a character exhibits some Christ-like qualities and preferably sacrifices himself for a greater good, then you can go ahead and call him a Christ figure.

Talk to me (just not with your mouth full please)

Chapter 2- Nice to Eat with You: Acts of Communion

In the past, the act of eating used to be way more important than it is now, almost ritualistic. With meals taking so long and so much effort to prepare, it is no wonder that they were. Eating together as a family was a no-brainer, and it was a very important time of bonding and discussion. Today's society has gotten to the point where we can simply pop out to a fast-food restaurant and eat it on the go, or we can order pizza and it will be at our front doors in 30 minutes, with little or no effort on our parts. Because of how easily accessible  food is, we have begun to lose an appreciation for the "ceremony" of the meal. That makes it harder for us today to understand how symbolic and important eating is in literature.

In a story, when people share a meal with each other, it very often signifies that something else, something deeper is going on behind the scenes.  Foster asserts that this "something" is an act of communion, or at least a symbol of how the people in the meal relate with one another. Eating is necessary to life, and it is such a private, personal thing that it should be considered a privilege to share that experience with someone, like Robin Fox says in her anthropological analysis of food and eating.

Eating with someone is a show of trust. For instance, in The Giver by Lois Lowry, each family eats their meal with one another and it is a very important time. At the beginning of the book, there is a passage talking about one such meal: 

"Who wants to be the first tonight, for feelings?" Jonas's father asked, at the conclusion of their evening meal. 

It was one of the rituals, the evening telling of feelings... Their parents, of course, were part of the ritual; they, too, told their feelings each evening.

This demonstrates just how sacred the meal is to the characters of this book. It is a ritualistic time each day that the whole family comes together to discuss their feelings. It is a place of trust and acceptance, symbolized by the trust they must have for each other to have a meal with each other in the first place.

But it can also symbolize something negative.

In The Chronicles of Narnia, Edmund eats the turkish delight in the presence of the White Witch. This symbolizes him opening himself up to her, him trusting her. In lowering his defenses and succumbing to the temptation of the dessert, he has become vulnerable and the White Witch takes advantage of that. He trusts the Witch enough to engage in the personal act of eating in her presence. In my opinion, the act of his eating is the very moment when he has committed to betraying his siblings, even if he does not yet know it himself. If you remember that scene, the Witch looks on with a hunger, an earnest anticipation of his response, using his vulnerability as he eats to tempt him more.

In the Bible, in the original communion, the Last Supper, there is a lot going on. Even if this meal is not allegorical (because it is the original) there are still many aspects of it that reflect meals throughout literature. This meal is the very epitome of a symbol of community. It is Jesus breaking his body and pouring out his blood for all believers as a symbol of communion in him and community with each other. But other than that, the meal went kind of poorly. In a Bible study I was doing over the Biblical allusions in the Lord of the Rings, our pastor said, "If a person leaves before the meal is over, that should make you immediately think: HE IS THE BAD GUY." He said that since a meal represents trust and community, someone leaving in the middle of it should be a clear sign that he is betraying that trust and community, and it should let the reader know that something bad is about to happen. My mind jumped straight to the Last Supper. In the account of the Last Supper found in John 13, Jesus says, "One of you is going to betray me. It is the one to whom I will give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish." He dips the piece of bread and gives it to Judas Iscariot. Satan possesses Judas, and Judas gets up and leaves the meal. Not only did he leave in the middle of the meal, he left before the most important part of the meal, the most defining moment of the Last Supper, the breaking of the bread, and the drinking of the cup. That is the very part of the meal that demonstrated the community they had with Jesus, and Judas leaving before that showed that he was not part of that community. It also foreshadowed the moment when Judas would betray Jesus to his death later that evening.

Other meals in literature, like the awkward, stuffy and tense meal at the beginning of the Great Gatsby with Daisy, Tom, and Nick, can symbolize this dysfunction of relationships. Since eating is such a personal matter, it reveals personal things about its participants.